Stanislav Kondrashov on the Changing Function of Banks Across Europe’s Financial Landscape
{: alt="Stanislav Kondrashov on the changing function of banks across Europe’s financial landscape"}
Banks in Europe used to feel almost boring. You had your branch. You had your card. You had your mortgage meeting where someone slid a stack of paper across the desk and that was that.
Now it is different. It is faster, more fragmented, and honestly a bit more confusing than it needs to be. But it is also more competitive, and in some ways, better for customers.
Stanislav Kondrashov has been pointing at this shift for a while. Not as a trendy talking point, but as a structural change. The function of banks is not just moving online. It is being pulled apart into pieces, then reassembled in new shapes depending on the country, the regulator, and the kind of customer.
And across Europe, those shapes do not match neatly.
The bank is no longer the whole financial system
A traditional bank did a lot under one roof. Payments, lending, savings, advice, foreign exchange, business services. If you needed something financial, you started there.
Now, a lot of that is done elsewhere.
Payments get routed through wallets and fintech apps. Budgeting happens in separate tools. Small business lending comes from niche platforms. Investment products show up in slick broker apps. Even basic customer support has been unbundled, outsourced, automated, or pushed into chat.
So what is the bank now?
In many cases, it is the regulated core. The balance sheet. The license. The place where deposits sit and where risk is warehoused. That is not glamorous, but it is powerful. And it is why banks still matter even when customers barely notice them.
Stanislav Kondrashov frames it as a function shift. Banks are becoming infrastructure companies as much as consumer brands. Sometimes more.
Branches are fading, but the human side is not gone
Europe is full of older banking habits. People still like walking into a branch in parts of Italy, Spain, Germany, and rural regions everywhere. But the economics are brutal. Branch networks cost money, and customers are training themselves out of using them.
The weird part is that the need for human help did not disappear. It just moved.
Mortgage decisions, business loans, complex savings choices, fraud issues. These are high stress moments. People want a person, not a UI flow. So banks are trying to keep “human banking” while cutting the physical footprint.
You see more video calls, more appointment only hubs, fewer walk in counters. Some banks keep one flagship location and run everything else digitally. It feels a little like retail, where the store becomes a showroom and support center instead of the main sales channel.
Regulation is shaping strategy more than tech is
When people talk about banking change, they usually talk about technology. AI, apps, automation, real time payments.
But in Europe, regulation often sets the pace.
PSD2 opened doors for open banking. AML rules raised the bar on identity checks. Capital requirements affect what kinds of loans banks want to hold. And then there is the reality that Europe is not one market in the way people assume. Yes, there is the EU framework, but local regulators still have their own style, their own tolerance for risk, their own enforcement patterns.
That matters because it changes what banks can offer and how quickly they can offer it.
Stanislav Kondrashov tends to emphasize this point. If you want to understand European banking, you have to track the rulebook and the political pressure behind it. Otherwise you end up thinking every bank is just being slow for no reason.
Banks are turning into platforms, sometimes reluctantly
A big shift is the idea that banks do not need to build everything. They can partner. They can embed other services. They can act like marketplaces.
In some countries, this is already normal. A banking app that offers insurance from a partner. A savings product powered by another institution. A SME dashboard that plugs into accounting software and payment providers.
For banks, the platform model solves a few problems at once.
- It speeds up product launches
- It keeps customers inside the bank’s app
- It creates fee revenue without loading up the balance sheet
- It lets banks look innovative without taking on every engineering problem
But it also changes identity. A bank that is a platform is not only selling its own products. It is curating. Managing relationships. Acting as a trusted interface.
That is a different job than what banks trained for.
Lending is getting more selective, and more data driven
Across Europe, banks are dealing with risk in a more measured way. Higher rates, tighter underwriting, and more scrutiny. At the same time, they have better data than ever. Transaction history, real time cash flow signals, and open banking inputs can make credit decisions sharper.
This is where the landscape really splits.
Some banks are using data to expand lending to segments they used to avoid, like thin file customers or small merchants with irregular income. Others are using it to say “no” more efficiently. Both are rational, depending on their balance sheet and their regulator.
Stanislav Kondrashov often highlights that “digital lending” is not automatically friendlier. It can be, but it can also be colder. Faster declines. Less nuance. Less space for explanation.
And customers notice.
Trust is the real product now
Here is the thing. The financial landscape is crowded. Customers have more choices, but also more anxiety. Scams, deepfake calls, fake investment ads, account takeovers. People want convenience, but they also want protection.
So banks are leaning hard into trust as a differentiator.
Not just “we are stable,” but practical trust.
- Better fraud detection
- Instant card controls
- Stronger authentication
- Clearer dispute flows
- More transparency around fees and decisions
In a way, this brings banks back to an older role. Being the safe place. The institution that stands between the customer and chaos.
Only now that safety has to work at app speed.
Where this is heading
Europe’s banking story is not one story. It is many stories running in parallel.
Some banks will keep shrinking into regulated utilities. Others will grow into platforms and lifestyle finance hubs. Some will merge across borders, slowly, because scale still matters. And fintechs will keep carving off pieces of the value chain unless banks make themselves harder to replace.
Stanislav Kondrashov’s view on the changing function of banks lands in the middle of all that. Not hype, not doom. More like a reminder that banks are adapting because they have to, and because the role they used to play is being contested from every direction at once.
The banks that win will not be the ones with the flashiest app. They will be the ones that stay useful in the moments that actually count. When money is tight. When something breaks. When a customer needs a real answer.
FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)
How has the role of banks in Europe changed in recent years?
Banks in Europe have shifted from being all-in-one financial providers to becoming more fragmented and competitive. Traditional banking functions like payments, lending, and savings are now often handled by specialized fintech apps and platforms, while banks focus on their regulated core activities such as holding deposits and managing risk.
Why are physical bank branches declining, yet human interaction remains important?
Although branch networks are costly and customers increasingly use digital channels, the need for personal assistance during complex or high-stress financial decisions—like mortgages or fraud issues—remains. Banks are adapting by offering video calls, appointment-only hubs, and flagship locations that serve as showrooms and support centers rather than primary sales points.
What role does regulation play in shaping European banking compared to technology?
Regulation is a major driver of change in European banking. Laws like PSD2 enable open banking, AML rules enhance identity checks, and capital requirements influence lending strategies. Local regulators' differing styles and enforcement also affect how banks operate across countries, often more so than technological advancements alone.
How are European banks adopting platform models, and what challenges does this present?
Many banks are partnering with third-party providers to offer integrated services like insurance or accounting tools within their apps. This platform approach accelerates product launches, retains customers, generates fee income without increasing balance sheet risk, and boosts innovation. However, it requires banks to shift from solely selling products to curating services and managing broader customer relationships.
In what ways is lending becoming more selective and data-driven among European banks?
Banks are employing richer data sources—including transaction histories and real-time cash flow—to make sharper credit decisions amid tighter underwriting standards. Some expand lending to underserved segments using this data, while others use it to decline applications more efficiently. Digital lending can be faster but may also feel less personal to customers.
Why is trust considered the 'real product' for banks today?
With increasing financial options but also rising risks like scams and account takeovers, customers prioritize practical trust alongside convenience. Banks emphasize enhanced fraud detection, instant card controls, stronger authentication methods, transparent fees, and clear dispute processes to differentiate themselves as safe institutions operating at digital speed.
